قالب:مراجعات لعبة فيديو

من ويكيبيديا، الموسوعة الحرة
اذهب إلى التنقل اذهب إلى البحث
Things to remember
  1. This template is not required in video game articles.
  2. This template is meant to supplement a reception section, not replace it.
  3. Not every review score in existence is needed.
  4. The scores should not be repetitive.

One of the required elements for a video game article on Wikipedia is a reception section, which itself should include critical response to the game. One of the tools that has been developed to help with this is the template {{مراجعات لعبة فيديو}}, which allows one to include both aggregate sites (MetaCritic, etc.) and individual site scores for a game. This template should be used as a support for a good reception, but not as a replacement for it. That is, it is very easy to pile in every possible review score you can find into the box and write a couple of supporting sentences to go with it and call it good, but this is not the best approach.

Guidelines[عدل]

The following is some advice to help improve the use of the {{مراجعات لعبة فيديو}} template and the reception section.

Consider if you even need to use {{مراجعات لعبة فيديو}}
For some older games or games that never made it to Western countries, traditional reviews, or those that provide some type of score, may be few and far between. (For example, سبيس إنفيدرز and Defender.) If you only have a couple such reviews that could be used to fill the table, consider foregoing the table and instead simply state these in the body of reception text.
Only add a score if you ويكيبيديا:الاستشهاد بمصادر.
For further information on video game sources, see ويكيبيديا:WikiProject Video games/Sources.
Every single-site review source should be used within the reception section
Putting a site's score and reference without using that reference elsewhere is just purposely loading that table for no reason. This does not apply for the aggregate scores references.
Consider the game's scoring breakdown.
Once a game has enough reviews (15 or more), it is a good idea to review how the game review aggregate sites qualify these, and then to look at the breakdown of those scores. A game that has received a similar grade across all reviews likely needs only a few data points to support it; a set of scores like 7.8, 8, 8.2, 7.9, 8, and 7.9 does not offer much to the reader when they can simply look at an aggregate score that is 80%. On the other hand, a game that had a wide variance may need more, particularly at the top and bottom levels - after all, you are going to want to use these extreme points to pull good and bad points about the game into the reception section.
A good rule of thumb is to consider what grades fall out of a +/- 5 or 10 point range from the aggregate average (e.g. for a game that scored 75 on average, one would look for scores above 80 and below 70 as outliers) If there are only a few, then the game has received relatively equal acclaim and only a handful of sources are necessary, while if there are variances, these definitely should be focused on if they are generally accepted sources.
Also be aware of how those rankings break down. A game that has received a 90 from 15 sources (give or take a few points) and a 60 from a single, reliable source has a strong outlier that needs to be considered in the body of the article, and it is important to understand the reasoning of the low grade from the source and to see if that can be used to meet up with other minor complains that the other 15 sources stated. Note, however, this should only be for those gaming review sources that are reliable. If the outlier score is from a source that is not strongly reliable, caution should be taken before including it. However, do consider reading that review and identifying what their praise or complaints are , as this may lead to search terms to find other, more reliable reviews that reiterate them.
Stay with the "usual suspects"
Barring unique cases described above, the following is usually a good selection of reviews that will help to scope the table, provide references for an in-depth reception section, and yet prevent table bloat:
Using these will give most tables 2 aggregates, and 5 to 6 scores. This is not meant to prevent adding more references to the reception section, but I have found that between these, you usually will have a good picture of any game's reception without additional work.
Never ignore traditional non-gaming sources
If your game gets reviews in the نيويورك تايمز, لوس أنجلوس تايمز, شيكاغو تريبيون, or other major national newspaper, Wired, the بي بي سي, or such other sources that normally have limited game coverage, these by all means are extremely valuable to include as they usually are written as reviews directed to the non- or casual gaming reader. They may not have scores (and thus not included in the table), but will likely have good, concise statements of why a game is good or bad, and other details.

الاستخدام[عدل]

استقبال
مجموع النقاط
المجموعنقاط
غيم رانكينغز91
نتائج المراجعة
نشرةنقاط
غيم ريفولوشنA-[2]
غيم برو5.0/5.0[1]
غيم سبوت8.2/10
غيم سباي88/100[3]
آي جي إن9.4/10.0[4]
Fake Magazine110%
Bogus Games95%
Grumpy Gamers22%
Grognards-R-Us50%
جوائز
نشرةجائزة
BAFTAPC Game of the Year (2000)
PC ZoneBest PC Game of All Time

All of the following fields are optional (though a 'Review scores' section will always appear even if empty):

title
can be used to provide a custom title for the table, otherwise, it will default to "Reception".
subtitle
used to add additional text before the collapsible section. This is necessary to add if want a longer title, as long titles via the "title" parameter will not center correctly.
state
  1. collapsed  –  the table will be collapsed (hidden) by default. This is useful for very long tables.
  2. autocollapse  –  the table will start out collapsed if there are two or more tables on the same page that use other collapsible tables. Otherwise, the table will be expanded. For the technically minded, see ميدياويكي:Common.js.
  3. plain  –  the table will always be expanded and the [hide]/[show] link on the right will not be displayed.
  4. If set to blank, the table will always start out in an expanded state.
rev1–7
these are for custom reviewers. Use with rev#Score.
agg1-2
these are for custom reviewers. Use with agg#Score.
award1–12
these are for any awards that the title has won.
width
sets the width of the table; default is 23em.

Star system[عدل]

If a reviewer uses a star system instead of a numerical rating, you can use the {{التقييم}} template to create the stars. However, this is not required and regular numbers can be used. If the reviewer does not use a star system, please do not replace their number system with stars.

Examples:

Code Result
{{التقييم|3|5}} 3/5 starsStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svg
{{التقييم|3.5|5}} 3.5/5 starsStar full.svgStar full.svgStar half RTL.svgStar empty.svg
{{التقييم|3.5|10}} 3.5/10 starsStar full.svgStar full.svgStar half RTL.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svg

Code[عدل]

Complete Blank Template
{{مراجعات لعبة فيديو
| title = 
| subtitle = 
| state = 
<!-- Aggregators -->
| GR = 
| MC = 
<!-- Custom aggregators -->
| agg1 = 
| agg1Score = 
| agg2 = 
| agg2Score = 
<!-- Reviewers -->
| 1UP = 
| AAction = 
| AdvGamers = 
| Allgame = 
| Amtix = 
| CRASH = 
| CVG = 
| Dragon = 
| Edge = 
| EGM = 
| EuroG = 
| Fam = 
| G4 = 
| GameFan = 
| GI = 
| GamePro = 
| GameRev = 
| GMaster = 
| GSpot = 
| GSpy = 
| GTM = 
| GRadar = 
| GT = 
| GW = 
| GameZone = 
| Hyper = 
| IGN = 
| MaxPC = 
| N64 = 
| NP = 
| NWR = 
| ONM = 
| OPM = 
| OPMUK = 
| OPMAU = 
| OXM = 
| OXMUK = 
| PALGN = 
| PCF = 
| PCGUK = 
| PCGUS = 
| PCPP = 
| PCZone = 
| Play = 
| PSM = 
| PSM3 = 
| SUser = 
| TX = 
| VG = 
| XPlay = 
| YSinclair = 
| YSpectrum = 
<!-- Custom reviewers -->
| rev1 = 
| rev1Score = 
| rev2 = 
| rev2Score = 
| rev3 = 
| rev3Score = 
| rev4 = 
| rev4Score = 
| rev5 = 
| rev5Score = 
| rev6 = 
| rev6Score = 
| rev7 = 
| rev7Score = 
<!-- Awards -->
| award1Pub = 
| award1 = 
| award2Pub = 
| award2 = 
| award3Pub = 
| award3 = 
| award4Pub = 
| award4 = 
| award5Pub = 
| award5 = 
| award6Pub = 
| award6 = 
| award7Pub = 
| award7 = 
| award8Pub = 
| award8 = 
| award9Pub = 
| award9 = 
| award10Pub = 
| award10 = 
| award11Pub = 
| award11 = 
| award12Pub = 
| award12 = 
}}
Predefined Aggregator Fields
Aggregator Code
غيم رانكينغز GR
ميتاكريتيك MC
Predefined Reviewer Fields
Reviewer Code
1أب.كوم 1UP
أدفاتنشور جيمرز  [لغات أخرى] AdvGamers
بلينكأكس Allgame
Computer and Video Games CVG
دراغون Dragon
إدج Edge
إلكترونك جيمينغ مونثلي EGM
يورو جيمر EuroG
فاميتسو Fam
G4 G4
غيم إنفورمر GI
غيم ريفولوشن GameRev
GameFan Magazine GameFan
جيم برو GamePro
جاميس رادار GRadar
GamesMaster GMaster
غيم سبوت GSpot
غيم سباي GSpy
GamesTM GTM
جيم تريلرز GT
GameWire GW
GameZone GameZone
Hyper Magazine Hyper
آي جي إن IGN
Maximum PC MaxPC
N64 Magazine N64
NGamer NG
NGC Magazine NGC
نينتندو باور NP
Nintendo World Report NWR
مجلة نينتندو الرسمية ONM
مجلة بلاي ستيشن الرسمية OPM
Official PlayStation Magazine (UK) OPMUK
Official PlayStation Magazine (Australia) OPMAU
مجلة إكس بوكس الرسمية OXM
مجلة إكس بوكس الرسمية OXMUK
PALGN PALGN
بي سي غيمر PCGUK
بي سي غيمر PCGUS
PC Zone PCZone
Play Magazine Play
PlayStation Magazine PSM
PlayStation 3 Magazine PSM3
آي جي إن TX
فيديو جيمر.كوم VG
X-Play XPlay

بيانات القالب[عدل]

هذا توثيق بيانات القالب لهذا القالب المستخدم بواسطة المحرر المرئي وأداة الترجمة والأدوات الأخرى.

بيانات قالب مراجعات لعبة فيديو

A template to show the review scores, aggregator scores, and awards given to a title.

وسائط القالب

وسيطوصفنوعحالة
titletitle

Title of the template.

غيابي
Reception
نصاختياري
subtitlesubtitle

Subtitle of the template.

نصاختياري
statestate

The tables collapsable settings.

غيابي
expanded
نصاختياري
alignalign

The tables horizontal alignment settings.

غيابي
right
نصاختياري
nana

This will set a fill of N/A grayed out.

غيابي
true
نصاختياري
GameRankingsGR

Only use for older games when Metacritic data is unavailable

نصاختياري
MetacriticMC

دون وصف

نصاختياري
1UP.com1UP

A+ to D-

نصاختياري
ACEACE

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Adventure GamersAdvGamers

دون وصف

نصاختياري
AllGameAllgame

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Amstrad ActionAAction

دون وصف

نصاختياري
AmtixAmtix

دون وصف

نصاختياري
ArabHWArabHW

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Computer and Video GamesCVG

9.2/10 (0 to 10)

نصاختياري
Computer Games MagazineCGM CGSP cdmag

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Computer Gaming WorldCGW

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Consoles +CP

دون وصف

نصاختياري
CrashCRASH

دون وصف

نصاختياري
DestructoidDestruct

دون وصف

نصاختياري
DragonDragon

دون وصف

نصاختياري
EdgeEdge

6/10 (1 to 10)

نصاختياري
Electronic Gaming MonthlyEGM

9.5/10 (0 to 10)

نصاختياري
EurogamerEuroG

Ceased scoring reviews in February 2015

نصاختياري
FamitsuFam

0 to 40

نصاختياري
G4G4

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Game InformerGI

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GameFanGameFan

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GameProGamePro

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GameRevolutionGameRev

A to D- (1996–2012)

نصاختياري
GamersFldGamersFld

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GamesMasterGMaster

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GameSpotGSpot

7/10 (1 to 10)

نصاختياري
GameSpyGSpy

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GamesRadar+GRadar

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GamesTMGTM

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GameTrailersGT

دون وصف

نصاختياري
GameZoneGameZone

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Giant BombGB

دون وصف

نصاختياري
HyperHyper

دون وصف

نصاختياري
IGNIGN

9.5/10 (1 to 10)

نصاختياري
IGNMEIGNME

9.5/10 (1 to 10)

نصاختياري
Impress WatchIW

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Jeuxvideo.comJXV

16/20 (1 to 20)

نصاختياري
JoystiqJoystiq

Ceased scoring reviews in January 2015

نصاختياري
JoypadJP

دون وصف

نصاختياري
M! GamesMG

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Mega FunMF

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Maximum PCMaxPC

دون وصف

نصاختياري
N64 MagazineN64

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Next GenerationNGen

5-star rating

نصاختياري
NGamerNG

دون وصف

نصاختياري
NGC MagazineNGC

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Nintendo LifeNLife

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Nintendo PowerNP

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Nintendo World ReportNWR

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Official Nintendo MagazineONM

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PlayStation Official Magazine – AustraliaOPMAU

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PlayStation Official Magazine – UKOPMUK

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Official U.S. PlayStation MagazineOPM

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Official Xbox Magazine(UK)OXMUK

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Official Xbox Magazine(US)OXM

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PALGNPALGN

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PC FormatPCF

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PC Gamer(UK)PCGUK

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PC Gamer(US)PCGUS

72/100

نصاختياري
PC PowerPlayPCPP

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PC ZonePCZone

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PCGamesNPCGN

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PlayPlay

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Pocket GamerPG

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PolygonPoly

Ceased scoring reviews in May 2018

نصاختياري
PlayStation: The Official MagazinePSM

دون وصف

نصاختياري
PSM3PSM3

دون وصف

نصاختياري
RPGamerRPG

دون وصف

نصاختياري
SaudiSaudi

دون وصف

نصاختياري
ShacknewsSN

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Sinclair UserSUser

دون وصف

نصاختياري
TeamXboxTX

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Total!TOT

دون وصف

نصاختياري
TouchArcadeTA

دون وصف

نصاختياري
TrueGamingTrueGaming

دون وصف

نصاختياري
USgamerUSG

5-star rating

نصاختياري
VentureBeatVB

دون وصف

نصاختياري
VideoGamer.comVG

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Video Games (DE)VGS

دون وصف

نصاختياري
X-PlayXPlay

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Your SinclairYSinclair

دون وصف

نصاختياري
Zzap!64Z64

دون وصف

نصاختياري

انظر أيضاً[عدل]