ويكيبيديا:سفارة

من ويكيبيديا، الموسوعة الحرة
اذهب إلى: تصفح، ‏ ابحث
  • عربية
  • français
  • English
  • أرشيف

مرحبا بكم في سفارة ويكيبيديا العربية! إذا كان عندك أي إعلانات أو أسئلة بخصوص قضايا دولية أو ويكيبيديا العربية أنت مدعو لوضعها هنا أو على صفحة نقاش هذه الصفحة.

رسالة إلى السفارة

Bienvenue sur l'ambassade du Wikipédia arabe! Si vous avez une annonce ou demande concernant les questions internationales ou le wikipédia arabe, veuillez les signaler ici ou sur la page de discussion de cette page.

Message à l'ambassade

Welcome to the embassy of the Arabic Wikipedia! If you have any announcements or questions regarding international issues or the Arabic Wikipedia you are invited to post them here or on the discussion page of this page.

Message to the embassy

أرشيف archive

New article requests[عدل]

‏‏

Hi! Here are some new article requests. Would anybody mind starting these?

Egyptian economist↑

Thanks WhisperToMe (نقاش) 06:04، 27 أغسطس 2013 (ت ع م)

COMPLETED[عدل]

Light green check.svg تم

en:Death of Ahmed Jaber al-Qattan وفاة أحمد جابر القطان
en:Death of Fadhel Al-Matrook وفاة فاضل المتروك

WhisperToMe (نقاش) 10:30، 25 يونيو 2014 (ت ع م)

What does a Healthy Community look like to you?[عدل]

Community Health Cover art News portal.png

Hi,
The Community Engagement department at the Wikimedia Foundation has launched a new learning campaign. The WMF wants to record community impressions about what makes a healthy online community. Share your views and/or create a drawing and take a chance to win a Wikimania 2016 scholarship! Join the WMF as we begin a conversation about Community Health. Contribute a drawing or answer the questions on the campaign's page.

Why get involved?[عدل]

The world is changing. The way we relate to knowledge is transforming. As the next billion people come online, the Wikimedia movement is working to bring more users on the wiki projects. The way we interact and collaborate online are key to building sustainable projects. How accessible are Wikimedia projects to newcomers today? Are we helping each other learn?
Share your views on this matter that affects us all!
We invite everyone to take part in this learning campaign. Wikimedia Foundation will distribute one Wikimania Scholarship 2016 among those participants who are eligible.

More information[عدل]


Happy editing!

MediaWiki message delivery (نقاش) 23:42، 31 يوليو 2015 (ت ع م)

Wikidata weekly summary #169[عدل]

Tech News: 2015-32[عدل]

15:51، 3 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)

Wiki labels & Revision Scoring as a Service for Arabic Wikipedia[عدل]

Hello Arabic Wikipedia,

I apologize for my complete lack of Arabic skills. I would most welcome if my post is translated to Arabic.

So computers are very good at crunching numbers.Du Your average calculator can out smart you in arithmetic. However computers are terrible at pretty much in everything else. Programming computers to under take any task no matter how simple beyond computing tends to be very difficult. This is where Artificial Intelligence comes in. With Artificial Intelligence we teach computers how to solve problems without explicit programming for the solution. This is what we are doing.

We are working on a project called m:Research:Revision scoring as a service which aims to provide quality control Artificial Intelligence infrastructure for Mediawiki and Wikimedia projects. We already have our system implemented and running on Azerbaijani, English, French, Indonesian, Persian, Portuguese, Spanish, Turkish and Vietnamese editions on Wikipedia. We are hoping to adapt our tool to serve Arabic language as well as a number of other languages.

We are currently mainly focusing on vandalism detection where we provide an API (m:ORES) that provides scores. We have made an effort to keep our system robust.

The examples I'll provide are based on a machine learning algorithm that was trained to use 20,000 reverted edits. This is kind of modelling is problematic for two reasons. First is, there are non-vandalism related reasons for edits to be reverted such as mistakes from new users, this would develop such an unproductive bias. Second problem would be it lacks the ability to distinguish good faith users from malicious ones. To demonstrate our system I will give three examples from English wikipedia. I have picked these three semi-random.

  • Score of 90% diff en:Moncef Mezghanni
    • As visible in the diff, it is clearly something that shouldn't be welcome on English wikipedia. Algorithms confidence also matches my human assessment.
  • Score of 75% diff en:Monin
    • When I look at the diff it isn't immediately clear to me if this should be reverted. Detailed look reveals that prior version had more neutral information, but new version at a glance isn't exactly clear cut vandalism, albeit spammy. Algorithms confidence drops just as my human assessment.
  • Score of 19% diff en:Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back
    • As visible in the diff this edit clearly improves the article. The algorithms confidence plummets as well. Algorithm is more confident that this edit should NOT be reveted.

We are also working towards a system for article quality where we use existing assessment by en:Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Teamto train our system. We only have this system on English wikipedia at the moment but we would be more than happy to expand to other language editions. I am uncertain if Arabic Wikipedia has a similar quality assessment scale. I have picked 5 random articles to demonstrate this.

Typical problem is that humans typically do not re-asses articles over time or articles are never assessed in the first place. Our system circumvents this problem by automating this.

We unfortunately lack language features such as bad words, informal words and stop words. This would be very helpful. We also need a localization of en:Wikipedia:Labels serving as our local landing page.

Once these are complete, we would like to start an edit quality campaign where we request the local community to hand code/label ~2000 revisions labeling them productive/damaging and good faith/bad faith. This would be similar to the campaign on English Wikipedia en:Wikipedia:Labels/Edit quality.

After this we will be able to generate scores for revisions that is usable by gadgets such as ScoredRevisions as well as (potentially) tools like huggle. If community desires it, it can even be used to create a local vandalism reversion bot.

So in a nutshell our algorithm relies on community input to support the community. Feel free to ask any questions. Either here, on meta or on IRC on the freenode server and #wikimedia-ai channel where we hang out. You can also reach us at https://github.com/wiki-ai

-- とある白い猫 chi? 19:39، 7 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)

User:OsamaK, do you think you can help with this? -- とある白い猫 chi? 19:40، 7 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)

Wikidata weekly summary #170[عدل]

Tech News: 2015-33[عدل]

14:57، 10 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)

VisualEditor News #4—2015[عدل]

—Elitre (WMF), 22:28، 14 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)

Wikidata weekly summary #171[عدل]

Tech News: 2015-34[عدل]

16:17، 17 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)

Wikidata weekly summary #172[عدل]

Tech News: 2015-35[عدل]

13:02، 24 أغسطس 2015 (ت ع م)